Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015)

The Consumption of On-Demand

Submitted
March 4, 2015
Published
2015-04-23

Abstract

This paper will document how consumers use on-demand services. In particular, focusing on individual and collective viewing of television and film ondemand. There is currently limited research about the consumption of on-demand content, despite it being a significant practice in consumer’s day-to-day lives. Mintel reported that 80% of consumers that own a television in the home, watch online content (Davies 2014b).  The investigation carried out an exploratory qualitative study, using a compressed phenomenological approach, with the purpose of attaining first-person descriptions of the respondent’s experiences with on-demand services. The key findings show that on-demand has become a linking device enabling consumers to bond with others over the content they are watching. This research has adapted Collective Spectatorship to include engagement and social interaction producing the concept: Connected Collective Spectatorship. The core argument is illustrated by three key themes. Connect not Escape: consumers are seeking access to on-demand content to feel part of a group and link to other people, by creating a topic of conversation. Creation of events: consumers are finding their own ways to make viewing on-demand special. People are now adding personalised meanings to viewing experiences through collective events by linking with others. And The gift of recommendation: consumers are offering recommendations to maintain and build links with others by sharing or passing on the experience.  Key Words = on-demand, consumption, television and film, recommendation, events, connect.

References

  1. Anderson, D. R et al., 1986. Television viewing at home: age, trends in visual attention and time with tv. Child Development [online], 57 (4) 1014-1054.
  2. Andrew, D., 1986. Film and Society: Public Rituals and Private Space. WestEast
  3. Film Journal [online], 1(1), pages 7-23. Available from:
  4. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/30689/filmjournal001
  5. pdf?sequence=1#page=9 [Accessed 20th November 2014].
  6. Barkhuus, L., and Brown, B., 2009. Unpacking the television: User practices around
  7. a changing technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction [online],
  8. (3), 1-22.
  9. Becker, B. and Connor, P., 1981. Personal values of the heavy user of mass media. Journal of Advertising Research [online], 21 (5), 37-43.
  10. Briggs, M., 2010. Television, Audiences and Everyday Life [online]. New York: Open University Press.
  11. Bryman, A., 2004. Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Bryman, A., 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Cameron, J., and Geidner, N., 2014. Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed From Something Blue: Experiments on Dual Viewing TV and Twitter.
  14. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media [online], 58 (3), 400-419.
  15. Clancey, M., 1994. The Television Audience Examined. Journal of Advertising Research [online], 34 (4), 258-276.
  16. Clough, P. and Nutbrown C., 2007. A Student’s Guide to Methodology. 2nd Edition.London: SAGE.
  17. Danaher, B. and Waldfogel, J., 2012. Reel Piracy: The Effect of Online Film Piracy on International Box Office Sales [online]. United States: Social Science Research
  18. Network.
  19. Davies, P., 2014a. Tablets are transforming on-demand viewing; but will linear TV Follow? [online]. London: Mintel Group.
  20. Davies, P., 2014b. Televisions - UK - November 2014 [online]. London: Mintel Group.
  21. Dichter, E., 2004. The Strategy of Desire [online]. 2nd Edition. New Jersey:Transaction Publishers.
  22. Einav, G., 2010. Transitioned Media: A Turning Point into the Digital Realm [online].New York: Springer.
  23. Elmer, G. (2012). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society [online], 15 (1), 18-30.
  24. Garitaonandia, C., Fernandez, E., and Oleaga, J., 2003. Relationship between the use of PPV on digital TV and TV consumption in a household and its equipment
  25. [online]. In: International Communication Association Annual Meeting, San Diego,
  26. 1-15. Available from:
  27. http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6c9bb01f-7fa7-49ab-a987-
  28. dca0ed867295%40sessionmgr115&vid=4&hid=120
  29. Gauntlett, D., and Hill, A., 1999. TV Living - Television, Culture and Everyday Life [online]. New York: Routledge.
  30. Gee, S., 2014a. Media Consumption Habits - UK - June 2014 [online]. London:Mintel Group.
  31. Gee, S., 2014b. Music and Video Purchasing - UK - August 2014 [online]. London:Mintel Group.
  32. Giuffre, L., 2013. The Development of Binge Watching. Metro Magazine [online],178, 101-102.
  33. Gunter, M., 1995. Watching People Watching Television: What Goes On in Front of the TV Set? Journal of Educational Television [online], 21 (3), 165-191.
  34. Hackney, A., 2010. Career Launcher: Television [online]. New York: Infobase Publishing Inc.
  35. Hamilton, K., and Wagner, B., 2011. An exploration of spectacular consumption at the movies: Mamma Mia! Journal of Customer Behaviour [online], 10 (4), 375-390.
  36. Hanich , J .,2014. Watching a film with others: towards a theory of collective spectatorship. Screen [online], 55 (3), 338-359.
  37. Hopkins, N. and Mullis, A., 1985. Family Perceptions of Television Viewing Habits. Family Relations [online], 34(2), 177-181.
  38. Jancovich, M., 2011. Time, Scheduling and Cinema-Going. Media International Australia [online], 139, 88-95.
  39. Krugman, D.M., and Gopal, Y., 1991. In-Home Observations of Television and VCRMovie Rental Viewing. Advances in Consumer Research [online], 18 (1), 143-149.
  40. Lee, F., 2010. The Influence of Family Viewing Preferences on Television Consumption in the Era of Multichannel Services. Asian Journal of Communication[online], 20 (3), 281-298.
  41. Lehtinen, I., 2012. On-Going Change in Film Consumption – Is Online AvailabilityDisrupting the Offline Markets? [online]. Dissertation (Bachelor of Arts). University of Lincoln.
  42. Livingstone, S. (2007). From family television to bedroom culture: young people’s media at home. In: Devereux., ed. Media studies: Key issues and debates. London:
  43. SAGE, 302-321.
  44. Lull, J., 1980. The Social Uses of Television. Human Communication Research[online], 6 (3), 197-209.
  45. Maisel, R. and Hodges Persell, C., 1996. How Sampling Works. London: SAGE.
  46. Massimiliano, T. and Mortari, L., 2010. Phenomenology and Human Science Research Today [online]. Zeta Books.
  47. MECinAction, 2013. The re-socialisation of TV [video, online]. MECinAction. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm2gPgGNx1k [Accessed 23 November 2014].
  48. Mintel, 2012. Digital movie sales quadrupled in the past five years [online]. London:Mintel Group.
  49. Mintel, 2014. Tablets swipe market share - now half of UK homes have one [online].London: Mintel Group.
  50. National Office of Statistics., 2014. Internet Access - Households and Individuals 2014 [online]. London: National Office of Statistics.
  51. Nielsen, J., 2013. The rise and rise of the UK VoD market. London: Warc. Available from:
  52. http://www.warc.com.libezproxy.bournemouth.ac.uk/Content/ContentViewer.aspx?M
  53. asterContentRef=bf5d0f25-d6ec-4b76-92a6-cf611cfe1ee3&q=ondemand&
  54. CID=A101081&PUB=MEC [Accessed 23 November 2014].
  55. Obrist, M., Bernhaupt, R. and Tscheligi, M., 2008. Interactive TV for the Home: An Ethnographic Study on Users’ Requirements and Experiences. International Journal
  56. of Human-Computer Interaction [online], 24 (2), 174-198.
  57. Punch, K.F., 1998. Introduction to Social Research - Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  58. Rubin, A.M., 1983. Television Uses and Gratifications: The Interactions of Viewing Patterns and Motivations. Journal of Broadcasting [online, 27 (1), 37-52.
  59. Saxbe, D., Graesch, A., and Alvik, M., 2011. Television as a Social or Solo Activity:Understanding Families’ Everyday Television Viewing Patterns. Communication
  60. Research Reports [online], 28 (2), 180-189.
  61. Schmitt, K. L., Woolf, K.D., and Anderson, D.R., 2003. Viewing the Viewers: Viewing Behaviors by Children and Adults During Television Programs and Commercials.
  62. Journal of Communication [online], 53 (2), 265-281.
  63. Seale, C., 1998. Researching Society and Culture. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  64. Silverstone, R., 1994. Television and Everyday Life [online]. London: Routledge.
  65. Slingbox, 2014. What is Placeshifting? Foster City, CA: Sling Media Inc. Available
  66. from: http://uk.slingbox.com/get/placeshifting [Accessed 22 November 2014].
  67. Smith and Boyle, 2012. The Rise of the “Connected Viewer†[online]. Washington,D.C.: Pew Research Center.
  68. Spangler, T., 2014. Netflix Remains King of Bandwidth Usage, While YouTube Declines. Los Angeles: Variety Media LLC. Available from:
  69. http://variety.com/2014/digital/news/netflix-youtube-bandwidth-usage-1201179643/
  70. [Accessed 18 November 2014].
  71. Thinkbox, 2013. Screen Life: TV in demand [online]. London: Thinkbox.
  72. Thompson, C.J., Locander, W.B., and Pollio, H.R., 1989. Putting Consumer Experience Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 16(2), 133–
  73. West, K., 2014. Unsurprising: Netflix Survey Indicates People Like To Binge-Watch TV. Portland: Cinema Blend LLC. Available from: http://www.cinemablend.com/television/Unsurprising-Netflix-Survey-Indicates-
  74. People-Like-Binge-Watch-TV-61045.html [Accessed 22 November 2014].
  75. Wohn, D.Y., and Na, E.K., 2011. Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday [online], 16 (3-7).
  76. Zillich, A.F., 2014. Watching television with others: The influence of interpersonal and communication entertainment. The European Journal of Communication
  77. Research [online], 39 (2), 169-192.