Incorporating the Rights of Non-Human Life into our Daily Lives: Ecological Citizenship through a ‘Deep Ecology’ Perspective
Bettina Sand Dørffer
Bournemouth University
Abstract
This paper will introduce a philosophical gap within the international political laws and plans by showing that an ecological citizenship is already being performed and happening nationally around the world e.g., Ecuador, Bolivia, and New Zealand. For the citizenship to become fully transnational a global account containing its duties and obligations must be provided. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals are currently the only version of a transnational plan we’ve got thus the Goal 15: ‘Life on Land’ will be assessed through the deep ecological principles because deep ecology will be used in this paper as the morally right way to understand an ecological citizenship. An assessment of the Goal will conclude that morally we are failing as the United Nations 17 Goals are far from the morals of deep ecology, but the goals are still one step closer toward an ecological citizenship than what we had before. This paper will show possible ways to practically implement the principles of deep ecology through some current deep ecological practices like the lifestyles of Indigenous’ Peoples, the religion of Jainism, veganism, a new way of calculating GNP, the concept of interspecies solidarity and wild gardens. Finally, it will be concluded that an ecological citizenship through a deep ecological perspective can be used to incorporate the rights of non-human life into our daily lives, for example, by using a radically revised version of the United Nations 17 Goals.References
Anker, P., and Witoszek, N., 1998. The dream of the Biocentric community and the
structure of utopias. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 2, 239-256.
Arneson, R., 2002. Egalitarianism. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopaedia
of Philosophy [online]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism Accessed on 12 December 2021.
Asah, S., 2015. Post-2015 Development Agenda: Human agency and the
inoperability of the sustainable development architecture. Human Development and Capabilities, 16(4), pp. 631-636.
Asilsoy, B., Oktay, D., 2018. Exploring environmental behaviour as the major
determinant of Ecological citizenship. Sustainable cities and society, 39, 765-771.
Blaustein, J., Pino, N., Fitz-Gibbon, K and White, R., 2018. Criminology and the UN
sustainable development goals: the need for support and critique. Criminology, 58(4),767-786.
Bratton, S., 1999. Luc Ferry’s critique of deep ecology, Nazi nature protection laws
and environmental anti-semitism. Ethics and Environment, 4(1), 3-22.
Brennan, A., and Norva Y. S. L., 2002. Environmental Ethics. Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online]. Available from:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/ Accessed on 1 March 2020.
Britannica, the editors of Encyclopedia, 2019. Sherpa. Encyclopedia Britannica
[online]. Available from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sherpa-people Accessed on x20 October 2021.
Brunell, L., 2013. Building global citizenship: Engaging Global Issues, Practicing Civic
Skills. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(1), 16-33.
Calvert, S., 2014. Ripened by human determination: 70 years of the Vegan Society
[online]. Available from: https://www.vegansociety.com/sites/default/files/uploads/Ripened%20by%20human % 20determination.pdf Accessed on 26 October 2021.
Charman, K., 2008. Ecuador first to grant nature constitutional rights. Capitalism
Nature Socialism, 19(4), 131-132.
Cherry, R., and Sandhu, H., 2013. Insects in the religions of India. American
Entomologist, 59(4).
Coulter, K., 2017. Humane jobs: A political economic vision for interspecies
solidarity and human-animal wellbeing. Politics and Animals, (3), 31-41.
Dedeoglu, C., Dedeoglu, C., 2020. Information infrastructures and the future of
ecological citizenship in the Anthropocene. Social Sciences, 9(1).
DesJardins, Joseph R., 2015. Biocentrism. Encyclopaedia Britannica [online]. Available
from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/biocentrism Accessed on 12 December 2021.
Dobson, A., 2003. Citizenship and the Environment [online]. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Ehrlich, P., and Turnbull, C., 2014. Sustainable cities: The Australian Aboriginal
Example. Stanford [online]. Available from:
https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/sustainable-societies/ Accessed on 25 August 2021.
European Commission, 2020. Animal Welfare [online]. Available from:
https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/welfare_en Accessed on 1 May 2020.
Goodwin, B., 2014. Using Political Ideas. 6.Edition. West Sussex: Wiley
Guha, R., 1989. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A
Third World critique. Environmental Ethics, 11(1), 71-83.
Harari, Y., 2011. Sapiens. London: Vintage
Heywood, A., 2013. Political Ideas: An introduction. 5. Edition. Basingstoke:
Macmillan Palgrave.
Howles, T., Reader, J., Hodson, M., 2018. Creating an Ecological Citizenship:
Philosophical and theological perspectives on the role of contemporary environmental education. The Heythrop Journal, 997-1008.
ICCA Consortium, 2021. Territories of life: 2021 Report [online]. Available from:
https://report.territoriesoflife.org/ Accessed on 25 August 2021.
Madsen, P., 2016. Deep ecology. Encyclopedia Britannica [online]. Available from:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/deep-ecology Accessed on 20 October 2021.
Mandle, J., and Roberts-Cady, S., 2021. John Rawls: an ideal theorist for nonideal
times? Oxford University Press’ Academic Insights for the Thinking World [online]. Available from: https://blog.oup.com/2021/02/john-rawls-an-ideal-theorist-for-nonideal-times/ Accessed on 20 October 2021.
Margil, M., 2018. The rights of nature gaining ground [online]. Available from:
https://www.openglobalrights.org/the-rights-of-nature-gaining-ground/ Accessed on 21 April 2020.
Mcleod-Kilmurray, H., 2012. Commoditizing nonhuman animals and their consumers:
industrial livestock production, animal welfare and ecological justice. Bulletin of
Science, Technology and Society, 32(1), 71-85
Næss, A., 1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A
summary. Inquiry 16, 95-100.
Næss, A., 1989. Ecology, community and lifestyle: outline of an ecosophy [online].
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sessions, G., and Næss, A., 1984. The Basic Principles of Deep Ecology [online].
Available from: http://thechurchofdeepecology.org/page-3.html Accessed on 25
August 2021.
Spannring, R., 2019. Ecological citizenship education and the consumption of animal
subjectivity. Education Sciences, 9(41), 1-11.
Strohl, G., Shah, U., and Dundas, P., 2021. Jainism. Encyclopedia Britannica [online].
Available from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Jainism Accessed on 26 October 2021.
The Investopedia Team, 2021. Gross National Product (GNP) [online]. Available from:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gnp.asp Accessed on 12 December 2021.
UN, 2020. Sustainable Development Goals – Knowledge Platform [online]. Available
from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300 Accessed on 4 May 2020.
UNESCO, 2018. UNESCO’s Commitment to Biodiversity: Connecting people and
nature for an inspiring future [online]. Paris: UNESCO.
Wenar, L., 2008. John Rawls; 2.3 Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory; 4 Justice as Fairness:
Justice within a liberal society; 5.6 Reconciliation and Realistic Utopia. Edward N.
Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy [online]. Available from:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/ Accessed on 26 October 2021.
Wohlleben, P., 2017. The Hidden Life of Trees. London: Williams Collins.
WWF Denmark, 2021. Project Danmarks Vilde Haver [online]. Available from:
https://www.wwf.dk/om-os/hvor-kaemper-vi/projekt-danmarks-vilde-haver/
Accessed on 16 December 2021.
