Register Login

Journal of Promotional Communications

Search
PDF

Published

2018-12-04

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

The Young still don’t vote for the ‘Nasty Party’. The perception of the Conservative party brand by younger voters

Byron Quale

Abstract

The 2017 UK General Election saw the Conservative Party not only lose their majority in the Commons, but also revealed that the majority of younger voters tended not to vote Conservative. Following research carried out by Pich et al., (2015) and Pich et al., (2018), this research seeks to build on this previous work by following the same qualitative projective techniques used to assess the brand image and reputation of the UK Conservative Party under the leadership of Theresa May. Using branding theory and political psychology theories of schema and emotions, this study investigates whether there has been a change in the Conservative Party’s image since 2015 and why this had an effect on the way people voted at the 2017 General Election. Using a split methodology of secondary polling data to inform the research on how people voted in the 2017 UK General Election. This study then carried out focus groups using qualitative projective techniques as prescribed by Pich et al (2018) to compare the results to previous work into the perception of the Conservative Party’s brand. This study finds that, as in previous elections, younger voters tend not to vote for the Conservative Party. In relation to the long-term reputation of the Conservative brand, the image of the party is now seen as ‘out of touch’, which is associated with Theresa May. This research finds that younger voters have negative emotions toward the Conservative brand. Therefore, because of the party’s brand reputation the perception of the Conservative Party by younger voters is one that is out of touch, if not nasty, with a leader that they can’t emotionally connect with. This study concludes that age is the dividing line between how people vote and the young still can’t vote for the ‘nasty party’.

References

Aaker, D.A., 1991. Managing Brand Equity. London: Free Press.

Axelrod, R., 1973. Schema Theory: An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition. American Political Science Review. 67(4). 1248-1266.

Bale, T., 2008. A bit less bunny-hugging and a bit more bunny-boiling? Qualifying

Conservative Party change under David Cameron. British Politics [online], 3, (3) 270–299. Available from: https://link-springer-com.libezproxy.bournemouth .ac.uk/content/pdf/10.1057%2Fbp.2008.7.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Bale, T., 2011. The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge: Polity Press. 283-362.

Bale, T., Hampshire, F, & Partos, R,. 2011. Having One’s Cake and Eating It Too:

Cameron’s Conservatives and Immigration. The Political Quarterly, [online]. 82, (3), 398-406 Available from: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.libezproxy.bournem outh.ac.uk /eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=8ab0a09e-5e58-4815-8dc518b76cb8 4a67%40sessionmgr102 [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Bartle, J. & Laycock, S., 2006. Elections and Voting. In: Dunleavy, P, Heffernan, R, Cowley, P, & Hay, C., Developments In British Politics. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 77-96.

Ben-Ur, J. and Newman, B., 2002. Motives, Perceptions and Voting Intention of Voters in the 2000 US Presidential Election, Psychology and Marketing [online]. 19 (12), 1047-1065. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com /doi/abs /10.1002/mar.10052 [Accessed 1 May 2018].

Bigi, A & Bonesa, M., 2013. Political party brand identity and brand image: an empirical assessment [online]. Conference Paper. Available from: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/273384041_Political_party_brand_identity_an d_brand_image_an_empirical_assessment [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Budge, I, Bartle, J, McKay, D, & Newton, K., 2007. The New British Politics. 4th (ed). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.329-259.

Carpini, M., 1994. The Method Is the Message: Focus Groups as a Method of Social, Psychological, and Political Inquiry [online]. Available from: https://pdfs.

semanticscholar.org/a3b4/8ffb3d1a4651884b7ed2261feaee45644ef6.pdf [Accessed 2 March 2018].

Cottam, M., Masters, E., Preston, T., & Dietz, B., 2016. Introduction to Political Psychology: 3rd (Ed). Oxon: Routledge.

Curtice, J & Hunjan, S., 2009. The impact of leadership evaluations on voting behaviour: Do the rules matter? [online]. Available from: https://ecpr.eu/Files tore/PaperProposal/ecfbae24-7f63-499c-af5a-0f212f8b1332.pdf [Accessed 9 March 2018].

Curtis, C. 2017. How Britain Voted at the 2017 General Election [online]. London: YouGov UK. Available from: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/06/13/how-britain -voted-2017-general-election/[Accessed 10 January 2018].

Cwalina, W, Falkowski, A, & Newman, B., 2011. Political Marketing: Theoretical and Strategic Foundations. London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. 129-160.

Dahlberg, S., 2009. Voters’ Perceptions of Party Politics - A Multilevel Approach [online]. Available from: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/20036 /1/gupea _2077_20036_1.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2018].

Davies, G. & Mian, T., 2010. The reputation of the party leader and the party being led. European Journal of Marketing [online]. 44 (3/4), 331–350. Available from: https://www-emeraldinsight com.libezproxy.bournemouth.ac.uk /doi/pdfplus /10.1108/03090561011020453 [Accessed 5 March 2018].

De Chernatony, L. 2007) From Brand Vision to Brand Evaluation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Downs, A., 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

Dunleavy, P, Heffernan, R, Cowley, P, & Hay, C., 2006. Developments In British Politics. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

French, A. &, Smith, G., 2010. Measuring political brand equity: a consumer oriented approach", European Journal of Marketing,. Journal of Marketing Management. [online]. 44, (3/4), 460–477. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1108/03090561011020534 [Accessed 5 April 2018].

French, A. &, Smith, G., 2011. Measuring the changes to leader brand associations during the 2010 election campaign. Journal of Marketing Management [online]. 27, (7/8), 718–735. Available from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.libezproxy. bournemouth.ac.uk/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=f7b33ef4-8c3a-497d81a2-7268a8e1e992%40sessionmgr 4007 [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Gould, P.,1998. Why Labour Won. In: Crewe, I., Gosschalk, B. & Bartle, J. Why Labour Won the General Election of 1997. London: Frank Cass Publishers, 3-11

Green, J., 2008. Cameron in context: Conservative Party Strategy in opposition, 1997 – 2007 [online]. Available from: https://www.rose-hulman.edu/~casey1/ BABGreen.pdf [Accessed 9 May 2018].

Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M., 2008. Sociology: Themes and Perspectives: 7TH Ed). London: HarperCollins Publishers Limited.

Harding, R., 2017, British Social Attitudes: the 34TH Report, London: NatCen Social Research [online]. Available from: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/ british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspx [Accessed 12 March 2018].

Ipsos Mori, 2017. Political Monitor 2017 Election Final Poll [online]. London: Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/ipsos-mori-finalelection-poll-2017 [Accessed 10 January 2018].

Ipsos Mori, 2017. State of the State 2017 -2018 [online]. London: Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/IpsosMORI/the-state-of-the-state-20172018 [Accessed 10 January 2018].

Jost, J, & Sidanius, J., 2004. Key Readings In Social Psychology: Political Psychology. New York: Psychology Press.

Kennedy, R, Lazer, D, & Wojcik, S., 2017. Improving election prediction internationally. Science [online]. 355. (6324) 515-520 Available from: DOI:

1126/science.aal2887 [Accessed 2 March 2018].

Lewis, H., 2015. The shadow of the Nasty Party hangs over the Tories again. NewStatesman, 8 October 2015 [online]. Available from: https://www.newstates man.com/politics/uk/2015/10/if-tories-don-t-want-be-tagged-nasty-party-againthey-have-be-twice-nice-labour [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Lilleker, D., 2006. Key Concepts in Political Communications. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Lloyd, J., 2006. The 2005 General Election and the emergence of the 'negative brand. In: Darren G. Lilleker, Nigel A. Jackson and Richard Scullion, eds, The marketing of political parties. Political marketing at the 2005 British general election. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 59-80.

Malhotra, N.K, & Birks, D.F., 2003. Marketing research: An applied approach. London: Prentice Hall.

Marcus, G., & MacKuen, M., 1993. Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns. American Political Science Review [online]. 87. (3) 672-655 Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938743 [Accessed 9 May 2018].

Marcus, G, Neuman, R, & Mackuen, M., 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1-95.

May, T., 2002. Address to the Conservative Party Conference [online], Conservative Party Speeches. Available from: https://conservativespeeches.sayit.Mysociety .org/speech/600929 [Accessed 4 January 2018].

Miller, A., Wattenberg, M., & Malanchuk, O., 1986. Schematic Assessments of

Presidential Candidates. American Political Science Review [online]. 80. (2) 521540 Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i333655 [Accessed 9 May 2018].

Ormrod, R. P., Henneberg, S. C., & O'Shaughnessy, N. J. 2013. Political Marketing:

Theory and Concepts. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Pattie, C., 2015. Hard Evidence: does a party leader’s personality matter?. The Conversation [online]. 4 May 2015. Available from: https://theconversation. com/hard-evidence-does-a-party-leaders-personality-matter-39541 [Accessed 1 April 2018].

Pich, C., Armannsdottir, G., & Dean, D., 2015. The elicitation capabilities of qualitative projective techniques in political brand image research. International Journal of Market Research, 57, 357–394.

Pich, C., Armannsdottir,G. & Spry, L., 2018. Investigating political brand reputation with qualitative projective techniques from the perspective of young adults. International Journal of Market Research [online], 60 (2),198-213. Available from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.libezproxy.bournemouth.ac.uk/eds/pdfviewer/pdf

viewer?vid=2&sid=8ebece32-59fe-4d81-a8b66536a89789c0% 40sessionmgr4006 [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Prosser, C, Fieldhouse, E, A, Green, J, Mellon, J, & Evans, G., 2018. Tremors But No Youthquake: Measuring Changes in the Age and Turnout Gradients at the 2015 and

British General Elections [online]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com /sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=3111839 [Accessed 12 March 2018].

Riley, M., 2017. Politics - A Brand for Me?: Why established political parties could benefit from an understanding of the principles of brand management. Poland: Amazon Fulfilment.

Scammel, M., 2007. Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [online]. 611 (1): 176-192 Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/ 10.1177/0002716206299149 [Accessed 5 March 2018].

Schneider, H., 2004. Branding in Politics—Manifestations, Relevance and Identity Oriented Management, Journal of Political Marketing [online]. 3 (3), 4167.Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J199v03n03_ 03 [Accessed 5 February 2018].

Stewart, M and Clarke, H., 1992. The (Un)Importance of Party Leaders: Leader Images and Party Choice in the 1987 British Election. The Journal of Politics [online]. 54 (2), 447-470. Available from: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com. Libez proxy.bournemouth.ac.uk/eds/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=02f9b527-7a6a-40099de7-48a1c4236a70%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdm Umc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsjsr.2132034&db=edsjsr [Accessed 9 May

.

YouGov, 2015. Leaders – Perceptions [online]. London: YouGov UK. Available from:https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/7rj2tjj m1c/YG-Archives-Pol-Trackers-Leaders-Perceptions-050515.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2018].

YouGov, 2015. Prospect Survey [online]. London: YouGov UK. Available from: https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/owc2a5or pr/Establishment_Extra_Variables_Website.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2018].

YouGov, 2017. Best Prime Minister (BG) [online]. London: YouGov UK. Available from: https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/gig 19 pxk17/YG%20Trackers%20-%20Best%20Prime%20Minister.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2018].

YouGov, 2017. Results GE2017 Demographics [online]. London: YouGov UK. Available from: https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/docu ment/1mb88iuadf/InternalResults_170613_2017Election_Demographics_W.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2018]

YouGov, 2017. Survey Results [online]. London: YouGov UK. Available from: https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/3l2op3cwrq /ImoResults_170601_PartyLeaders_W.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2018].